Maybe not so current as wikipedia.
Mayby not so well presented as many documentaries I found in youtube.
But it is frustating to read the evidence and after that read the conclusion that is polar opposite to the evidence that can only happen if the author is trying to fool the reader.
I dont know, there is a small possibility that confirmation bias actually is so strong that Stephen may actually honestly look at the evidence and think that it proves something it does not prove.
Proving only that he is not scientifically trained, he does not possess critical thinking. If he did, he could not work at the Discovery Institute, it is required for all employees there that they totally lack critical thinking.
I kind of recommend this book to all Atheists interested in evolution vs. creation debate, but I predict you cannot read it past 100 pages.
Main thesis of the book is that Neo-Darwinian evolution takes tens of millions years, that cambrian evolution happened so fast that Neo-Darwinian evolution theory cannot explain it --- when Neo-Darwinian evolution exactly expects that speed. He repeatedly defines Neo Darwinian theory boldy wrong, and debunks it. Typical Strawman tactics. This strawman tactic just proves to me that he is a closet atheist that works in the discovery institute because in his state the easiest way to make money is to cash in with creatonists. He is in for the money, not for the faith.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti