”The fundamental problem confronting neo-Darwinism, as with chemical evolutionary theory, is the problem of the origin of new biological information.”
No stephen No!
Do you really think that the genetic code of your children is the same as yours? Forensics experts can find murdered with a small sample of blood on murder site because each person, each being has unique genetic mark.
Unique gene is not new biological information?? you miss the central part of Darwin´s theory! you shold read his book, it´s educating!
the theory is about how small changes accumulate into large changes over long periods of time.
small variations become large changes. each generation is different.
Let me give you an example. I make a small program that changes one letter in a sentence randomly each loop, I end up with hundreds of new intelligent sentence and thousands of gibberish sentence.
Is there new information on the intelligent sentences? case closed.
”leading theoreticians acknowledge that neo-Darwinism has also failed to explain the source of novel variation without which natural selection can do nothing”
Okey. anyone can see this is bullocks. Stephen is refererring to Ken Hoving and Ken Ham as "leading theoretians."
”As a host of distinguished biologists have explained in recent technical papers, small-scale, or “microevolutionary,” change cannot be extrapolated to explain large-scale, or “macroevolutionary,” innovation.”
"Micro evolution and Macro evolution has been scientifically observerd." aron ra.
11th creationist falsehood by aron ra:
Difference between micro and macroevolution is time scale.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti