tiistai 15. lokakuuta 2013

no stephen no!

”Whenever we find functional information—whether embedded in a radio signal, carved in a stone monument, etched on a magnetic disc, or produced by an origin-of-life scientist attempting to engineer a self-replicating molecule—and we trace that information back to its ultimate source, invariably we come to a mind”

No stephen, no! you began the book with industrial and information revolutions.
these events were formed by living beings, living cells and each step forward depended on advancements of previous ideas...

this is a pure reflection of biological evolution. human complexity grew gradually, growing on speciation and adaptation. animals grew from gradual advancements of single cell organism.

single cell organisms grew from gradual advancements of dna and rna advancements inside that cell!

and so on. our revolutions just reflect, our mind reflect, our cellular evolution.

michael minski wrote a wonderful book called the "society of mind" where he demonstrated how a mind is just asociety of neurons who work together to solve issues. sometime arguing themselves, perhaps all the time.

everything comes down to simple and small lego pieces,  nature proves that COMPLEXITY RISES FROM SIMPLICITY"

You cannot explain complexity with greater complexity,it goes against nature... that´s why its called supernatural. but it just means unnatural. 

Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti